I C 862/12

<p> <strong> <!-- --> <span class="underline"> <!-- -->Sygn. akt I C 862/12 </span> </strong> </p> <div> <h2>POSTANOWIENIE</h2> <p> Dnia 28 listopada 2013 r.</p> <p>Sąd Okręgowy w Krakowie Wydział I Cywilny</p> <p>w składzie następującym:</p> <p>Przewodniczący <span class="underline"> <!-- -->SSO Izabella Dyka</span> </p> <p>SSO Paweł Darmoń</p> <p>SSO Kamil Grzesik</p> <p>Protokolant Elżbieta Bator</p> <p>po rozpoznaniu w dniu 28 listopada 2013 r. w Krakowie na rozprawie</p> <p>sprawy z powództwa <strong> <!-- --> <span class="anon-block">D. N.</span> – reprezentanta grupy złożonej z: </strong> <span class="anon-block">E. G. (1)</span>, <span class="anon-block">E. G. (2)</span>, <span class="anon-block">J. M. (1)</span>, <span class="anon-block">J. K.</span>, <span class="anon-block">A. K.</span>, <span class="anon-block">A. C.</span>, <span class="anon-block">J. P.</span>, <span class="anon-block">Z. P.</span>, <span class="anon-block">R. P.</span>, <span class="anon-block">Z. B. (1)</span>, <span class="anon-block">M. B. (1)</span>, <span class="anon-block">B. D.</span>, <span class="anon-block">H. Z.</span>, <span class="anon-block">K. Z.</span>, <span class="anon-block">M. D. (1)</span>, <span class="anon-block">M. D. (2)</span>, <span class="anon-block">M. M.</span>, <span class="anon-block">P. M.</span>, <span class="anon-block">I. C.</span>, <span class="anon-block">W. C.</span>, <span class="anon-block">K. K.</span>, <span class="anon-block">J. O.</span>, <span class="anon-block">A. J.</span>, <span class="anon-block">D. L.</span>, <span class="anon-block">A. N.</span>, <span class="anon-block">Z. B. (2)</span>, <span class="anon-block">T. B.</span>, <span class="anon-block">D. N.</span>, <span class="anon-block">J. Z. (1)</span>, <span class="anon-block">J. Z. (2)</span>, <span class="anon-block">A. S.</span>, <span class="anon-block">P. S.</span>, <span class="anon-block">T. J.</span>, <span class="anon-block">B. S.</span>, <span class="anon-block">T. S.</span>, <span class="anon-block">E. M.</span>, <span class="anon-block">S. M.</span>, <span class="anon-block">B. M.</span>, <span class="anon-block">J. M. (2)</span>, <span class="anon-block">M. W.</span>, <span class="anon-block">E. B.</span>, <span class="anon-block">M. B. (2)</span>, <span class="anon-block">J. S.</span>, <span class="anon-block">G. G.</span>, <span class="anon-block">M. G.</span>, <span class="anon-block">D. S.</span>, <span class="anon-block">W. S.</span>, <span class="anon-block">A. B.</span> i <span class="anon-block">W. B.</span>,</p> <p>przeciwko <strong> <!-- --> <span class="anon-block"> (...)</span> z siedzibą w <span class="anon-block">N.</span> </strong> </p> <p>o <strong> <!-- -->zapłatę </strong> </p> <p> <strong> <!-- -->postanawia</strong>:</p> <p>I. rozpoznać sprawę w postępowaniu grupowym,</p> <p>II. oddalić wniosek strony pozwanej w przedmiocie nakazania powodowi złożenia kaucji na zabezpieczenie kosztów procesu.</p> </div>